Front-End Inflation Pricing at Odds with Rate-Cut Bets Signals Tactical Breakeven Opportunity 

Market-implied signals for U.S. inflation and interest rates are now diverging to a degree rarely seen outside of stress periods. One-year CPI swaps and front-end breakevens are currently pricing inflation to average about 3.3% over the next 12 months—130 basis points above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target—while Fed funds futures discount roughly 105–110 bps of policy easing by this time next year.   

If both were to occur simultaneously, the real policy rate would fall to approximately -1.2% (nominal funds rate near 2.1% less the 3.3% forward inflation rate), a level the Fed has historically avoided except during sharp downturns such as 2008–2009 or 2020. Conversely, if the Fed delivers that magnitude of cuts, headline and core inflation are unlikely to persist near 3.3%, suggesting that at least one of these market expectations will need to recalibrate.  

This disconnect has already pushed the 1-year forward real yield into negative territory—currently around -0.35%—a technical setup that has historically preceded meaningful short-end TIPS repricing. Since 1990, there have been only four episodes where inflation expectations exceeded 3% and 1-year real yields were negative: early 2004, mid-2011, mid-2021, and late 2022. In those instances, 1- to 2-year breakevens narrowed between 40 and 80 basis points within 2–6 months as the Fed’s policy stance and market pricing converged.   

Translating this into P&L terms, the breakeven convexity of short TIPS—about 0.08%–0.12% price change per basis point per year of duration—means that a 40 basis points move could generate a 32 to 48 basis points swing in total return over a short horizon, before carry effects.  

Current breakeven levels—1-year around 3.2% and 2-year near 2.8%—offer asymmetric risk/reward for tactical positioning. A short in 1- to 2-year TIPS against nominal Treasuries isolates breakeven exposure and benefits from compression whether inflation undershoots due to an aggressive cutting cycle or the Fed cuts less than priced to preserve credibility. Each 10 basis points change in breakevens equates to roughly a 0.10% price change per year of duration, meaning a modest reversion to 2.9%–3.0% could deliver a 20 to 30 basis points return in weeks to months, with upside risk capped by already rich valuations.  

From a broader allocation perspective, maintaining a neutral nominal duration stance remains prudent until there is sustained evidence of cyclical labor market deterioration—the most reliable historical trigger for aggressive Fed easing without destabilizing inflation expectations. In the meantime, the more compelling opportunity lies in monetizing expensive front-end inflation protection while avoiding outright long-duration bets until growth and employment data clearly weaken.  

Please share your comments below and click here for prior editions of “Treasury & Rates.”