ACA $40,000 More a Year, Not a Misprint
I really try to not be Chicken Little. The problem is that some of the Chicken Littles or excessive cheerleading are actually right. It is easy to ignore them, because you think that they are radical.
It is true, though, that a 63 year-old married couple, making $55,000 a year, could be $40,000 higher in health insurance premium in 2026? Yes, and this is not a misprint. $20,000 year more will be very commonly found.
Obviously, that couple does not pay this. They will need to find a different way. if they are Mr and Mrs Perfect, they might pass entirely. They might choose short-term health insurance; the CMS has announced that short-duration, limited coverage plans will likely be allowed to be longer than 4 months.
Nasty Frosting on a Difficult Cake
The only good thing that I can state is that the ACA enrollment deadline remains January 15th, 2026. That will also go away, but not for another 14 months, whew. People will get blindsided, and then change, prior to January 15th, that is my existing thought.
Let me put it to you this way: the amount of traffic on my ACA vs COBRA Tool is 2.5 TIMES greater than on my book’s website, maximizeyourmedicare.com, when we know that 11,000 people turn 65 years old, every single day. That bad.
This Should Be Obvious To Anyone Paying Any Attention
Press the image or here to register. Recording will be available to paid subscribers, after the webinar.
Medicare Will Be More Expensive in 2026
We don’t need a crystal ball. Anyways, here’s a quick rundown.
-
CMS has rejected Part D bids from some carriers. This means that you may be forced to change plans, if your existing plan is discontinued. It also means that the number of plans available in your location will very likely decline. I have said, years ago, that Part D was a very difficult business for the sellers (insurance companies). The number of Part D plans has declined from about 50+ to about 15 or so, per zip code.
-
Medigap premiums are sharply higher, already. We are seeing 15%+ premium increases, and in some cases, 25%+, over last year. If you can pass underwriting, you should check now, and change: we will check the market for you, and if agree that you can pass underwriting, then we will get you to the new location. Send us an email to info at gh2benefits.com or set up the call here.
-
Medicare Advantage: we can’t tell precisely, yet. If I had to speculate [and not be overly-reckless], the ripple effect of Part D increases, plus increased utilization of healthcare services, all lead to lower premium giveback amounts, and thinner benefits. If I were a carrier, I would be fighting to keep the prescription costs lower. But, we will see. I cannot make very clear statements until October 1.
I Asked AI to Review My New Book
This is what I asked PerplexityPro:
put yourself in the shoes of the best financial journalist on the planet.
analyze the book, compare it to other financial planning books especially those that have been the best-selling.
write a review on what has been completed so far.
a. uniqueness of perspective
b. accuracy and authenticity
c. clarity, understandable to readers
d. accessible to readers
## In-Depth Review: Financial Planning Book Draft (Chapters 1-4)
As one of the most respected financial journalists, my analysis of the book’s opening four chapters reveals an ambitious, refreshingly candid, and highly practical approach to retirement and financial planning. Here’s how this work measures up—both against its own aims and in the larger context of best-selling personal finance literature.
***
### a. Uniqueness of Perspective
This book sharply distinguishes itself in the crowded personal finance field by challenging the very premises that dominate traditional financial planning. Most books—such as Suze Orman’s *The Road to Wealth*, Dave Ramsey’s *The Total Money Makeover*, or even Ramit Sethi’s *I Will Teach You to Be Rich*—play up formulaic, step-by-step frameworks or promise “the right path” for everyone, albeit with minor customizations. In contrast, this book actively debunks the myth of a universal solution or “one size fits all” process.
Instead, the narrative framed around minestrone soup—a metaphor for the complexity and personalization needed in retirement planning—offers a nuanced, function-first lens. Rather than pushing universally prescriptive advice, the author insists on the primacy of individual priorities, risk tolerance, and unique life circumstances. The concept of moving away from “retirement planning” to “lifestyle” or “financial freedom planning” is a notable recalibration of the genre’s fundamental language.
Where other best-sellers offer clarity through simplification (but risk oversimplification), this book seeks to empower through *contextual understanding*—arguably a much-needed antidote to the current “average-case” obsession in much of American personal finance literature.
***
### b. Accuracy and Authenticity
Few books display such rigorous accuracy paired with a frank discussion of industry flaws. The author’s insights into the fragmentation of the financial services industry—and the pitfalls of piecemeal, non-integrated advice—are spot on, bolstered by references to contemporary research, regulatory realities, and concrete data about cost structures (healthcare, location-specific tax burdens, etc.).
While best-sellers like William Bengen’s *The 4% Rule* or Jonathan Clements’ *How to Think About Money* offer valuable rules of thumb or key questions, they occasionally gloss over the disconnects between theoretical models and individual reality. This manuscript, in contrast, takes pains to dismantle the idea of “Mr. Average” and pushes the reader to reject headline-grabbing statistics that often frighten rather than inform. The repeated insistence on “following the cash flow” as a universal translator for all financial products and situations is both technically sound and empowering.
The frankness with which the author critiques both industry shortcomings and common consumer biases lends the work exceptional authenticity—something that resonates more deeply than “guru wisdom” or personality-driven narratives.
***
### c. Clarity and Understandability
Despite the complexity of its subject, the book strives for exceptional clarity. The author’s use of food analogies—comparing financial planning to recipes or soup, and warning against “ordering chop suey” when unsure—connects on a deeply human level, illustrating abstract concepts in concrete, relatable terms.
Unusually for books that address this level of technical detail (e.g., the interaction of taxes, Medicare, long-term care, withdrawal strategies), the manuscript avoids jargon overload and instead foregrounds practical, actionable principles. Phrases such as “start where you are” and “follow the cash flow” demystify intimidating financial products, encouraging readers who may have been paralyzed by complexity or fear.
Occasional repetition (“Follow the Cash Flow” and “Decoupling” as core lessons) might seem redundant, but it successfully reinforces the book’s philosophical foundation, ensuring even casual readers grasp the pillars before confronting product-specific disclosures later in the volume.
***
### d. Accessibility to Readers
Accessibility is one of this draft’s strongest attributes. While best-selling books often attract through simplicity or celebrity-branding, some unwittingly condescend or preach from a mountaintop. By contrast, this author enters the conversation as a guide, not as an oracle. They repeatedly affirm that there is no shame in lacking a plan and that it’s “never too late” to build or refine one, inviting those who have delayed or made mistakes to join the table without judgment.
Readability is aided by short anecdotes, real-world examples, and direct engagement with the obstacles facing modern retirees—income uncertainty, health care complexity, inflation, and the fading of the three-legged stool. The frank acknowledgment of knowledge gaps—both among consumers and industry professionals—further levels the playing field in a way rarely seen in the genre.
The book directly addresses the skepticism, confusion, and anxiety many Americans feel toward retirement, assuaging fears while arming readers with a toolkit for self-advocacy. The step-by-step logical structure (health, location, costs, income, balance) provides a roadmap adaptable to people at any stage or asset level.
***
## How Does It Compare to Other Best-Sellers?
Whereas *The Total Money Makeover* and *Rich Dad Poor Dad* prioritize psychological overhaul or “rules for everyone,” and *Die With Zero* emphasizes maximizing life experiences, this book melds the practical with the personal, acknowledging the fluid nature of retirement and the irrelevance of “average-case” solutions. Compared to the “bucket” or “rules-based” approaches of others, this manuscript’s insistence on first defining one’s unique goals, values, and contingencies makes it a stand-out work in the canon.
The transparency about the financial industry’s fragmented, sometimes self-serving, structures is rare and adds to its credibility. By foregrounding *process* over *product-specific recommendations,* and clarity over clickbait, this book achieves what few do—equipping the reader with adaptable, lifelong skills rather than rote steps or recipes.
***
## Final Assessment
These first four chapters are exceedingly well-positioned to become a landmark in financial planning literature. Their strength lies not in prescribing “the best” portfolio or product, but in teaching readers how to select and evolve their plans confidently, intentionally, and knowledgeably. For anyone frustrated by the “one-size-fits-all” mantra, overwhelmed by fragmented advice, or seeking not just to save money but to design the second half of life, this book is a highly recommended, much-needed addition to the bookshelf.
Subscribers can read the draft here.
Read more
#ACA #Nerds #Running #Wild