Global Long-End Yields Surge as Fiscal Risks Drive Structural Repricing 

Global bond markets are now confronting a structural repricing of fiscal risk, with the long end of sovereign curves pushing through multi-decade levels as investors balk at the combination of rising deficits, fiscal dominance over monetary policy, and mounting unfunded liabilities tied to healthcare, pensions, and social security.  

In Europe, 30-year German Bunds have broken above 3.40%, the highest since 2011, while 30-year French OATs are yielding above 4.45%, signaling that even core issuers are not immune to fiscal risk repricing. In the U.K., supply pressures are magnifying the selloff, with the syndication of a new 10-year Gilt benchmark coinciding with 30-year yields spiking to 5.7%—a level not seen since 1998. Japan has joined this global trend, with 30-year Japanese government bonds (JGBs) climbing beyond 3.28%, a record high for the super-long end, reflecting concerns over fiscal sustainability in the context of the Bank of Japan’s policy stance.  

U.S. Treasuries remain relatively contained, with the 30-year yield at approximately 5.0%, still below the May peak of 5.15%, but the underlying pressure remains skewed toward higher term premia as deficits widen and political rhetoric increasingly threatens Fed independence. 

Historical Echoes 

The current repricing in global long-term yields has strong historical echoes. In the mid-1990s, U.S. Treasuries experienced a sharp bear steepening as concerns over the Clinton administration’s fiscal path, combined with heavy issuance, pushed 10- and 30-year yields higher by more than 200 basis points between 1993 and 1994—a move that shocked markets, reset term premia, and forced investors to demand a more credible fiscal trajectory. Today’s backdrop is similar, reflecting investor unease over large and persistent budget deficits.   

Europe offers another instructive comparison. The sovereign debt crisis of 2010–2012 demonstrated how markets can turn abruptly against governments perceived as fiscally fragile, driving spreads on Greek, Italian, and Spanish bonds to historic wides and forcing ECB interventions. While Germany, France, and the U.K. are nowhere near that level of stress, the rise in European yields shows that investors are once again attaching a fiscal-risk premium even to core sovereigns.   Japan’s 30-year JGB yield above 3.2% likewise recalls the 1998 JGB crisis, when a collapse in confidence around fiscal sustainability forced yields higher despite the BOJ’s easing bias.  

The common thread across these episodes is that markets eventually demand higher long-end compensation when governments appear unable or unwilling to align spending with sustainable funding paths. Today’s steepening is not just cyclical noise but a structural warning that fiscal credibility is once again becoming the binding constraint in developed-market sovereign debt.  

What’s the Strategy? 

Strategies in this environment favor maintaining a bearish stance on the long end, expressed via curve steepeners (5s30s or 10s30s, e.g. NOB spread) in markets with heavy supply calendars, notably the U.K. and Euro area. Relative-value opportunities exist in long U.S. duration versus short U.K. Gilts, given U.S. yields are lagging the recent highs seen elsewhere and the U.S. fiscal optics, while poor, are still perceived as less fragile than the U.K.’s.  

For cross-asset hedging, the rise in equity vol alongside contained rates vol suggests equity downside protection via VIX calls can complement steepener trades in rates. Credit markets are particularly vulnerable, with higher long-end yields raising refinancing costs; investors should consider barbell positioning—holding higher-quality credit or agencies against underweight exposure in high yield. 

For global sovereign allocators, the fiscal narrative argues for selective exposure: Japan and the U.K. are most exposed to long-end stress, while U.S. Treasuries may temporarily outperform on relative safety but remain subject to supply-driven bear steepening over the medium term. Positioning should reflect that this is not a short-lived flow shock but the beginning of a longer-term regime shift in how bond markets price sovereign risk. 

Please share your comments below and click here for prior editions of “Treasury & Rates.”