The Overlooked Risk in Second Marriages Without a Prenup


When Real Housewives star Teresa Giudice married Luis Ruelas in 2022, public attention centered on the extravagance of the wedding. But behind the headlines was a critical legal omission. The couple reportedly didn’t sign a prenuptial agreement (prenup). Now, with more than $3 million in tax liens looming over them, their marriage could become a financial cautionary tale.

For high-net-worth clients, this story serves as more than just celebrity drama. It illustrates the real-world consequences of entering a complex marriage without a clear financial plan.

More Assets, More Risk

While prenups are beneficial in any marriage involving substantial assets or liabilities, they can become especially significant in second marriages. Individuals entering into a subsequent marriage often do so later in life, with more assets accumulated, more financial responsibilities in place and, in many cases, children from previous relationships. These marriages also tend to follow the experience of divorce, making individuals more aware of the emotional and financial toll that separation can bring.

Second marriages are often marked by greater practicality. Unlike first marriages, which may be driven by romantic idealism, second unions are frequently approached with a more pragmatic mindset. As a result, there’s often a greater willingness to formalize expectations and protect existing wealth, particularly when businesses, real estate holdings or trusts are involved.

Related:‘If You’ve Seen One Family Office …’: Debunking the Snowflake Myth

A properly drafted prenup can define how assets and debts will be managed during the marriage and divided in the event of a divorce. It can shield one spouse from the other’s financial obligations and help preserve family wealth across generations. In states like Florida, where marital property is divided through equitable distribution (not community property rules), a prenup can ensure that a spouse’s premarital assets, such as a home, business interest or investment portfolio, remain protected.

However, disclosure is critical. Courts require that both parties provide full and frank disclosure of their financial situations before signing a prenup. Hidden debts or undisclosed assets can render the agreement invalid. And even with a valid prenup in place, actions taken during the marriage, such as retitling property, commingling funds or using joint earnings to improve a separately owned asset, can affect how those assets are ultimately treated in divorce.

It’s also important to understand that third parties, such as creditors or the Internal Revenue Service, aren’t bound by a couple’s marital agreement. A prenup can allocate financial responsibility between spouses, but it can’t stop the government from pursuing joint assets or accounts. Structuring ownership appropriately and making smart financial decisions during the marriage is just as important as signing a prenup.

Related:How Financial Advisors Can Navigate Cross-Border Tax Challenges in 2025

In many cases, financial complications from one spouse, such as tax liens or business liabilities, can spill over into the couple’s shared economic life. Even if a debt isn’t legally shared, it can affect cash flow, trigger enforcement actions or reduce the couple’s ability to make major purchases. A prenup, paired with full transparency, offers the best chance of avoiding these surprises.

Protection, Not Distrust

Despite their practical advantages, prenups can still carry a social stigma. Many people view them as a signal of distrust or assume they’re only necessary in the case of expected failure. But among HNW clients, prenups are increasingly understood as strategic financial tools, not romantic disclaimers.

Those with significant assets, family businesses or complex financial portfolios often see prenups as essential, not optional. These agreements can help protect a company from being dragged into divorce proceedings, ensure that family wealth remains intact and minimize legal exposure for extended family members or business partners. In fact, the more financial complexity involved, the greater the need for a comprehensive, carefully structured prenup.

Related:State Wealth Tax Innovations: What High-Net-Worth Clients Need to Know

Still, conversations about prenups can be emotionally difficult. They challenge the ideal of complete trust and unity in marriage. But many legal professionals argue that this discomfort can be constructive. Much like premarital counseling encouraged in some religious traditions, the process of drafting a prenup forces couples to have meaningful conversations about money, expectations and long-term goals. These discussions can strengthen a relationship by promoting transparency and mutual understanding from the outset.

The increasing number of high-profile disputes involving celebrities and wealthy individuals has highlighted the risks of skipping this critical step. Prenups don’t guarantee a painless divorce, but they reduce the likelihood of prolonged litigation and offer clarity when it matters most.

In second marriages, individuals are typically more educated about alimony, asset division and legal fees, often through firsthand experience. That knowledge, combined with a desire to protect children or legacy assets, makes prenups a vital component of responsible financial planning.

Ultimately, entering a marriage, especially a second one, with a well-crafted prenup isn’t about predicting failure. It’s about protecting the future. For HNW clients, the risks of going without one are too great.




#Overlooked #Risk #Marriages #Prenup

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *